Reolink updates Learn More
Meet Reolink at IFA 2024! Learn More
Reolink Q&A Learn More
Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
In my view considering the lag, the better fix for manual focusing would be to consider every mouse click as a single command to move the focus with a single “step” in the desired direction.No matter how long is mouse clicked down and no matter when it’s released.And this will need a slider or numeric input cell to set the said “step” length.Or the “step” could have only some default value and thus to be not user changeable if the next additional buttons are added. So could be implemented additional buttons for let’s say 5x“step” for faster rough closing the desired position or even “step”/5 buttons for fine tuning. Or of course some other than 5 value of the multiplier/divider after testing. 5 is just for instance. Pros: This way the time and lag or network issues wouldn’t matter at all.And the accuracy will depend only to the “step” length and eventually the multiplier/divider.Cons: The downside would be to require many clicks to actually reach the desired position.And with shorter “step” for better accuracy the clicks could be quite a few let’s say.And eventually would be needed these additional buttons for rough and fine tuning.
I also have the same way of thinking as you and I believe that if applied in this way, everything will become stable and much better. wordle nytimes, everyone can follow this guide of his and it will definitely work great!
Welcome Back!
Hi there! Join the Commnunity to get all the latest news, tips and more!