Reolink updates Learn More
Meet Reolink at IFA 2024! Learn More
Reolink Q&A Learn More
Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
How about a video replay client for the Amazon firestick? It would be nice to have an inexpensive way of playing video from Reolink cameras at at TV. I was able to install the android APK on the Firestick and it ALMOST works! It looks like changes are required to support a different screen size on the Android Reolink client build.
The LAN ports on the RLN are behind a router and NAT internal to the RLN box. DHCP is provided putting all RLN LAN devices in the 172.16.25.x subnet. DHCP IP addresses will only be provided to devices that have a Reolink MAC vendor ID. There is no IP connectivity from one LAN port to another LAN port on the RLN. You can see it's a very non-standard configuration from what you would normally expect to see. I'm not sure why they did it this way, but it really limits what you can do with the RLN LAN ports other than hooking up Reolink cameras.
Using a fixed encryption key common to all products is a bad design choice. When your "encryption" isn't really encryption at all, but is in fact a simple XOR of "Charlie is the designer of P2P!!," that is an even worse design choice. Reolink really needs to fix this security vulnerability for 3816 customers. So Reolink, while you're fixing this security problem, please fix the Adobe Flash problem that you promised to fix for us several years ago.
Adobe announced the upcoming end of Flash support in July of 2017. Reolink waited 3.5 years to start rolling out HTML5 firmware and did not make any exceptions regarding not to be updated IPC_3816M models until December 3, 2020. All along customers were lead to believe that an update for this older hardware was forthcoming. This was very poorly handled on Reolink's part and left many dissatisfied customers.
I also have a bunch of IPC_3816M RLC-410S cameras and also need to access via web browser. We've been promised this update literally for YEARS and now we're told at the last minute "we won't be updating." This camera would not have been "old" if you had made the update years ago as you should have, rather than waiting until the last minute. We've waited and waited and now you say "we won't be updating." Please reconsider this. You're about to have a bunch of unhappy, former customers on your hands.
In my case it is RLC-410S. I'm looking forward to the long promised update.
HTML5 in Chrome is working great in the RLC-510A I just received from Reolink for evaluation. There is a new button on the title bar of the window next to the "Center/Stretch" button that allows you to toggle between Flash and HTML5Hopefully we'll see HTML5 software releases for the older cameras soon.
Yes! I think we'll all be extremely disappointed if Reolink doesn't deliver on HTML5 after promising us this capability and this timeline for the last several years.
I'm not optimistic that they will get this done as promised by the end of the year. If they truly were planning on delivering this, they would be starting now. This is not a small epic.
Good news! Thanks.
Yes. When will it be available? I keep getting reminders in Chrome that Flash is going away and do I want to disable Flash now. You'll have many unhappy customers if you think that you will require us to replace all of our cameras to get HTML5 support. We purchased cameras with your assurance that HTML5 was "coming."
It's a bright day outside. My RLC410S (v2.0.0.1389_18081402) looks very dark when the picture is all white.I can adjust white balance so that it works well with snow, but then normal non-snow pictures don't look good.Any ideas?2019-11-11_10-20-34.jpg
Welcome Back!
Hi there! Join the Commnunity to get all the latest news, tips and more!