Navigation

    Home
    All Categories
    • KEEN Trail Camera
    • Top #ReolinkCaptures Awards
    • Announcements and News
    • Wishlist
    • #ReolinkTrial
    • Discussion About Products
    • Reolink Captures
    • Reolink Client & APP
    #ReolinkTrial
    Reolink Captures
    Log in to post
    Guest
    • Guest
    • Register
    • Login

    Learn More

    Reolink updates Learn More

    Meet Reolink at IFA 2024! Learn More

    Reolink Q&A Learn More

    Battery cameras - totally disappointed

    Discussion About Products
    3
    7
    442
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • user_677627617915061_677627617915061
      user_677627617915061 last edited by

      This is a message to raise a complaint, already expressed by others, regarding the limitations of battery-powered cameras. These limitations have been justified multiple times with reasons such as hardware power limits or battery consumption, but I believe they are just excuses.

      This applies to the support of protocols such as ONVIF or RTSP, but it does not justify the inability to access an image snapshot, the inability to send an image via FTP instead of email, or the inability to receive motion notifications through a URL call.

      At the same time, there are missing functionalities that could reduce battery and CPU consumption, such as the ability to set motion detection on only a portion of the image.

      These are functionalities that any product intended for a not entirely unaware audience, an audience that wants to integrate it with a smart home system or simply with their voice assistant, must have.

      It's a shame because otherwise, Reolink products are excellent.

      Reply Quote
      Share
      • Share this Post
      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • copy the link
        Copied!
      0
        • joseph_1979
          Joseph Global Moderator @user_677627617915061 last edited by

          @user_677627617915061_677627617915061 Technically it is possible for the camera to wake up periodically and upload an image(s) but the battery will soon be drained especially when the camera will be triggered often.

          Reply Quote
          Share
          • Share this Post
          • Facebook
          • Twitter
          • copy the link
            Copied!
          0
          • user_677627617915061_677627617915061
            user_677627617915061 @Joseph last edited by

            @joseph-chircop_497308027822318
            The camera is always up, otherwise the motion detection wouldn't work. And it's always connected, otherwise, it would not be possible to connect with the app.
            From the battery perspective, the cost to upload the image or send an email when a motion is detected is almost the same.

            Reply Quote
            Share
            • Share this Post
            • Facebook
            • Twitter
            • copy the link
              Copied!
            0
            • Crimp On_62210811129
              Crimp On @user_677627617915061 last edited by joseph_1979

              Alas, the battery powered cameras rely on a cheap Passive Infra Red (PIR) chip to detect motion. Whereas the line powered cameras compare video frames to detect how many pixels have changed, the battery cameras get a signal from the PIR chip, "motion detected". PIR chips are dirt cheap and consume practically no battery. (A single AA can keep a PIR sensor going for months and months.)
              Thus, the idea of limiting detection to only part of the video frame is not feasible.

              With all their limitations, there is a substantial market for "wireless" cameras (The Arlo, Nest, and Ring brands come to mind.) Personally, I found the lack of features and the "change the battery" problem made them unsuitable for me.

              Reply Quote
              Share
              • Share this Post
              • Facebook
              • Twitter
              • copy the link
                Copied!
              0
              • joseph_1979
                Joseph Global Moderator @user_677627617915061 last edited by joseph_1979

                @user_677627617915061_677627617915061 Only the PIR circuitry (typivally consumes around 40 microA) is always active if enabled while the other parts are in cold state. Once PIR detects motion then the appropriate hw and routines are activated. This is why battery operated cams are mostly equipped with PIR.

                Reply Quote
                Share
                • Share this Post
                • Facebook
                • Twitter
                • copy the link
                  Copied!
                0
                • joseph_1979
                  Joseph Global Moderator @Crimp On last edited by

                  @crimp-on_62210811129 Of course if there is power then undoubtedly the power fed cameras are the best choice.

                  Reply Quote
                  Share
                  • Share this Post
                  • Facebook
                  • Twitter
                  • copy the link
                    Copied!
                  0
                  • Crimp On_62210811129
                    Crimp On @user_677627617915061 last edited by

                    Another disappointment with the battery cameras is there is no provision for changing how the software functions if the user:

                    • Connects the camera to a solar panel (which Reolink sells) and thus can recharge the batteries every day, or
                    • Connects the camera to a USB power supply, which provides infinite power.

                    The cameras are designed and programmed around the concept of prolonging battery life, with no provision for the user to say different.

                    The nerd in me wants to determine what the battery cameras are doing to conserve power. I have a strong suspicion that it is the modern technique described in this web article:
                    howiwifi(dot)com/2020/06/25/power-save-methods/

                    In other words, the camera responds to connection attempts from the Reolink app or Reolink Client because it sends one quick frame every couple of seconds and if nothing comes back, it goes back to low power mode. When I open the Windows Client, for example, regular RLC camera very quickly show the "Connected" status, and the battery camera remain "unconnected". Clicking on the camera causes it to connect in 3-4 seconds. A nerd with good Wireshark skills could probably capture the sequence of "wake" events and determine exactly how long the sleep periods are.

                    Reply Quote
                    Share
                    • Share this Post
                    • Facebook
                    • Twitter
                    • copy the link
                      Copied!
                    0
                    View 4 replies
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  All Categories
                  Announcements and News Reolink Client & APP Discussion About Products #ReolinkTrial Reolink Captures Wishlist KEEN Trail Camera
                  Never miss Reolink hot deals, news, and updates tailored for you.

                  Thanks for your subscription!

                  Please enter a valid email address.

                  Oops… Something went wrong. Please try again later.

                  You are already subscribed to this email list. :)

                  Submission failed. Please try again later.

                  Reolink Store|Support|About Us|Privacy Policy|Terms and Conditions

                  Copyright 2025 © Reolink All Rights Reserved.

                  Welcome Back!

                  Hi there! Join the Commnunity to get all the latest news, tips and more!

                  Join Now