Posts made by KimchiGUN

@reolink-alyson

Ok.. I think I read It wrong...

Capture a full 4K wide view for situational awareness while the second lens delivers up to 6× hybrid zoom for close details (faces, license plates, or package labels) without losing the big picture

So its clear enough to read LP's but it will not record/snapshot, right?

@reolink-alyson

I read that this cam does LPR... will that be written to the SD card? Or does it need the new NVR for this feature?

Also can this be written to the current NVRs?

Will there be a POE version?

@Chopstix
@joseph_1979

This is what I'm talking about. It's not a switch being compatible. It is a feature that makes the lag.

IGMP Snooping, Loop Detection, STP, Multicast/Unicast feature... these are the things off the top of my head that I would investigate.

I've been a network/wireless engineer for almost 20 years.

I added my cameras manually to the NVR. Per a static and I entered the static into the NVR. IGMP Snooping would help with the scanning of devices across switches and VLAN. Maybe enabling that will help?

@reolink_333507142684871

All my cams are connected remotely across the LAN and S2S VPN. I do not have any cams connected directly to the NVR.

Across the LAN port on the NVR.

This shouldn't be happening at all. Regardless of the VLAN. There is a lag in your network some where. Its good network practice to have your cams segregated on their own vlan. Makes me wonder if IGMP Snooping may solve this or hinder this? Sometimes it puts a slight lag on the traffic sometimes it doesnt. May want to turn down RTSP to STP (if you think spanning tree is only for loops, then go back to school )... Something is making it lag.

I have Cams and NVR reaching across a SD WAN or even a S2S VPN and it runs like a top. No lag. Again, segregated NVR and CAMs on their own vlan is better practice.

@joseph_1979

I do, but it says I dont have permission to send a DM. Weird.

Also why cant I DM users on this forum?

@joseph_1979

@Chopstix

Any updates on this? you got it working?

@user_863771412115668_863771412115668

I have 2 36 channel NVRs in 1 site... both almost full. Almost 70 cams. To offload this to a HPC cluster or GPU cluster would be too much $$ compared to 2 NVRs.

@joseph_1979

I can tinker and test all the time. Having been in the I.T. trenches for years and worked for a larged I.T. vendor that was high paced. Getting laid off 2 times during covid, I got in with a laid back company, time for me to cruise. Spend more time with the fam and enjoy a slower pace. I wish Reolink would send me more hardware (they did once) bruh! I'd test all day everyday!

Not so much customers come to this community. The most active one is at Reddit. The moderator mbaster is quite busy answering queries and testing new products. They have even a technical guy from Reolink who provides technical details the moderators are unable to give. In this community we never had any such technical support other than us..... what we learnt through our experience in using some of the Reolink products.

You know, I prefer this forum over reddit and FB group. Large portion of those post are from non technical, average, home users. Most of the questions are repeated over and over again. You will see a few good technical post within the week. But I know here, I can get answered or suggestions from you 2 that I know are technical. Not knocking the home/basic users, you have to start somewhere. You question can get lost in the that flood.

@joseph_1979

I have a track mix and one of my pet peeves... which is a very little one. The LED light moves with the cam. I would prefer this design. Where the LED's are stationary and the cam can move freely.

@reolink-alyson

Hopefully the POE version of the elite hardware.

@chopstix

Let's see how the Tmobile device works before we go anything fruther... Let us know.

@chopstix

Just to confirm, have you tried changing the mobile ISP's DNS servers to google?

If you're mobile ISP gives you a public IP and not a CG NAT, you could try port forwarding 9000. Then manually pointing you client app to that IP and port.

@chopstix

Can you give us more deets on the end goal? Why are you doing or needing this?

Not trying to be nosey, but this will give me a broader sense of what's is at play.

Thanks,
KG!

@big_ted

yeah like you said, would be nice for a changelog!

@user_961951840002251_961951840002251

This isnt done by the wireless cam or client.

A few things here... check if you have band steering on your wireless router, that will cause this! Turn it off.

If you have the Mini-Rssi option... turn it on the 5ghz at -73. This will manually boot you low signal clients off and force them to roam to the 2.4 band.

@user_951254242668760_951254242668760

I use mine as full time recording... 24/7 For quick access my fam and I use the SD card playback. If we need more indepth footage, we pull from the NVR.

my clients do the same as @joseph_1979 mentioned full time recording and a backup.

Viewing the cams one by one, it will stay on high. But if you view them all at one, they all will revert to low.

I wish they would let you view all on high, since I have a smoking GPU on my PC.